Customer feedback: Biden’s tax crusade puts privacy at risk


The Internal Revenue Service building is seen in Washington, United States on September 28, 2020. REUTERS / Erin Scott

NEW YORK, September 29 (Reuters) – What’s in US portfolios? Uncle Sam wants to know. President Joe Biden’s $ 3.5 trillion budget plan includes a proposal for the Internal Revenue Service to monitor citizens’ bank balances, payments and claims in order to fight tax evasion. It would cover all bank transactions over $ 600 – and, coupled with an inevitable shift from traditional currency to government-issued digital currencies, would be a blatant, possibly unconstitutional, invasion of privacy.

To tax what people earn, the federal government needs to know what people’s income is. Advocates of an income tax never really had to weigh this against the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects Americans from unreasonable searches and seizures. It’s easy to overlook the effect on privacy. Progressive-era Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis gives an example: he co-authored an 1890 fundamental law review article arguing for a right to privacy in US law, but also defended the 16th Amendment that made direct income taxation possible, according to researcher Jeffrey Rosen.

To mitigate the threat, taxation in the United States generally operates as a “self-report” system. Taxpayers themselves declare their taxable income, calculate their debt and pay their contributions. The IRS has the power to investigate fraud and demand payment of what is owed. In the early decades of income tax, the threat to individual privacy was not that great.

That’s changing, thanks to a trio of trends. One is the increasingly complex level of detail demanded as Congress uses tax policy to advance broader social and welfare goals. Not only income and investments, but family relationships, business activities, charitable giving, health insurance, medical expenses, and more go into the income of American households.

The second privacy invasion is the format in which personal financial data is kept by the government. The paper 1040 federal tax forms that individuals have filed for decades are cumbersome to process, but also difficult to physically access, copy, or transmit outside the walls of the IRS. Archives in digital form are infinitely more transportable, like gas that escapes easily and spreads far beyond the databases supposed to contain them.

When ProPublica released the details of the wealthy income tax returns earlier this year, its findings highlighted the risks of having a lot of personal information in the IRS databases. Right now, a number of groups, from hackers to foreign attackers, can siphon IRS data and have intimate knowledge of Americans’ privacy.

Congressional appetite for spending has grown – evidenced by the estimated $ 2.1 trillion budget deficit the Congressional Budget Office projects for 2021 – but public distaste for tax increases continues. Hence the third privacy threatening trend: the attempt to derive more revenue from existing tax legislation by increasing financial supervision. The IRS processed more than 3.5 billion “information returns” in 2018 – more than 10 for every man, woman and child in the United States. President Biden’s “America Plan for Families” calls for a vast expansion of reporting information to include “gross inflows and outflows on all business and personal accounts of financial institutions, including bank, loan and credit accounts. investment”. Congress seems ready to deliver.

Cryptocurrency users have been canaries in this financial monitoring coal mine. In 2020, taxpayers were required to report all transactions in digital currency, taxable or not. In 2018, after searching for vast treasure troves of information on all users of the leading crypto platform Coinbase (COIN.O), the IRS obtained a court order requiring the company to disclose information on 13,000 crypto users, to whom she sent threat letters. And the language slipped into the infrastructure bill would demand financial reporting from cryptocurrency processors who literally have no information to comply with.

At some point, the future financial supervision regime could cross the line between reasonable requests for information and unreasonable seizure of private financial records. The shift from analog fiat money to central bank digital currency, with its potential for real-time government control of citizens’ cash flows, raises the stakes. Biden’s proposal, if passed, could end up in the Supreme Court.

There may be other ways to improve tax compliance. The Government Accountability Office discovered last year that the IRS’s ability to use and process information was limited by outdated systems and a lack of coordination with other agencies. That implies that he could achieve higher collections by making better use of the powers at his disposal – but that hardly suggests that more data would increase compliance. In other words, the profit in terms of income is speculative, while the cost in risk to taxpayers is quite certain.

A premonitory warning came from Brandeis in a 1928 wiretapping case. “Ways could one day be developed by which the government, without removing papers from secret drawers, can reproduce them in court,” he said. he writes, a development that could expose “the most intimate events of the house”. It could describe the financial services system of the near future, which will run the affairs of clients in sight of the federal government.

If Congress continues to exercise full financial oversight for the application of income tax, the modern court may recognize the invasiveness of income tax for privacy in a way that the Brandeis era court did not.


– Christopher Giancarlo is Senior Legal Counsel at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and was the 13th Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

– Jim Harper is a non-resident senior researcher at the American Enterprise Institute, where he focuses on privacy issues and certain legal and constitutional law issues.

Editing by John Foley and Marjorie Backman

Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source for agenda-setting financial information. As the Reuters brand for financial commentary, we dissect big business and economic stories from around the world every day. A global team of around 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provide real-time expert analysis.

Sign up for a free trial of our full service at and follow us on Twitter @Breakingviews and at All opinions expressed are those of the authors.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.